Repository logo
Home
Communities & Collections
All of NBU-IR
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Jallikattu"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Jallikattu Tug of War, and Indian Supreme Court’s Tango marking a Giant Leap in Reverse for Legal Personality of Animal kind
    (University of North Bengal, 2015-03) Bharti, Sunanda
    The article discusses how the landmark judgment of Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) v. A. Nagaraja (2014), delivered by Supreme Court of India was superior in content, spirit and wisdom as compared to the latest AWBI v. UOI (May 2023). The former declared bulls unsuitable for sports like Jallikattu and bullock cart races. The court had then emphasised the need to interpret the Prevention of Cruelty Act, 1960 (PCA 1960) liberally in favour of animal welfare. It also assumed the role of parens patriae, responsible for safeguarding the rights of animals. The court argued that animals should not be treated as mere property, but as sentient beings deserving of legal protection. Animals became legal persons as a necessary effect of that judgement, though the court did not declare the same explicitly. However, the latter judgement has reversed the progress made in animal welfare. The Supreme Court's judgment in Animal Welfare Board of India v. UOI, delivered in 2023, allowed the resumption of Jallikattu and similar bovine sports. The court based its decision on amendments made by Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, and Karnataka to their state legislations, presuming that these changes eliminated the cruelty associated with these sports. The court emphasised the need to consider the amended rules alongside the legislation to understand their true effect. The article highlights the paradox between India's professed concern for humane treatment of animals and the prevailing practice of animal abuse. It argues that unless laws regarding the legal status of animals are revised, meaningful change in their treatment cannot be achieved. The writing concludes by stating that the recent judgment has undone the progress made since the Nagaraja case, jeopardising animal welfare in India.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    ‘Jallikattu’ as New Social Movement: Human Rights Vs Animal Rights
    (University of North Bengal, 2016) Debnath, Jayanta
    Once again it is proved that no community of the universe will allow anybody to take away their natural rights from them. In this case, a suitable example would be the event of ‘Jallikattu’ which is observed in South India especially in Tamil Nadu. It has been such a movement which raised variety of questions within Indian society. Jallikattu is an identity- based movement. It is infact a new social movement with old tradition and practice of Tamil people. This identity-based movement brought two different aspects of emotion and values all together that is the clash between human rights and animal rights. Both these groups wanted to be victorious, but such path of victory is not so easy. As a result both the parties choose judiciary to save their rights or ideology. In this circumstance, the role of the state both national and regional comes to the forefront. Thus, to settle this crucial issue the role of politics or political intervention has been momentous.
NBU-IR

The NBU Institutional Repository is managed by University Library, University of North Bengal. For any related queries feel free to contact with us at anytime.

Useful Links

  • Home
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

Our Services

  • University Library
  • NBU
  • Shodhganga
  • Plagiarism Check
  • DrillBit-Extrim

Contact Us

University Library
University of North Bengal
Raja Rammohunpur
PO-NBU, Dist-Darjeeling, PIN-734013
West Bengal, India.

Email: ir-help@nbu.ac.in

University Library, NBU copyright © 2002-2025