Indian Journal of Law and Justice, Vol. 13, No. 01

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4595

EDITORIAL NOTE

The last two years have been immensely difficult, worldwide, due to the Covid-19 pandemic. We are glad that the world is recovering gradually. However, the pandemic has ensued global crisis exacerbating deep-seating social inequalities within our societies. Women, low-income households, children and young people, as well as low-skilled, part-time temporary and self-employed workers, all have been disproportionately affected.

Keeping these issues in mind, the Editorial Board presents the 13th Issue of the Indian Journal of Law and Justice. Once again, with the incessant efforts and ‘never-say-die’ spirit of the editorial team, the India Journal of Law and Justice sets its foot in its journey for the second decade.

Keeping in tandem with the objective of the journal of being a multidisciplinary journal, the key focus of this edition ranges from human rights issues of women, women refugees, human trafficking, trans-rights, the criminal justice system to public health management, artificial intelligence and big data in health sector and human gene editing. This volume contains a Notes and Comments section with short articles highlighting concerns like terrorism and international criminal justice system, right to fair trial of victims and feminist perspective of the Kamtapur Movement. The book review segment contains review of the edited and annotated version of the celebrated Annihilation of Caste which has been edited and annotated by S. Anand and the foreword of which has been penned down by Arundhati Roy.

I thank all contributors for their submissions to this edition and their cooperation with the editorial team during the production phase. I would also like to express my gratitude to the entire Editorial Team whose commitment and perseverance made this publication possible.

Suggestions and opinions for the improvement of the journal is solicited.

With Best Wishes

Prof. (Dr.) Rathin Bandhopadhyay
Chief Editor

Browse

Filters

20221

Advanced Search

Filter by

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Arora, TarunStart date: 2022

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Judicial Approach towards Socio-Cultural Paradox on Entry of Women at Sabarimala
    (University of North Bengal, 2022-03) Arora, Tarun
    Justice is an attribute, in other words, a value addition to the dignity of life. Underscoring the vitality of this virtue of governance, the Constitution of India places it as the foremost goal of the polity. The juristic connotations indeed envision Constitution as a leveler lifting the veils from age old traditions of subjugation of women. Various provisions of the Constitution reflect gender neutrality as well as affirmative clauses of enabling nature equipping the State to take special legislative and executive measures for special classes or categories. Undoubtedly, the purpose of these clauses is to ensure a transformation not only of polity but also placing individual at the centre of a just societal order. Though little yet the significant impact of constitutional provisions on the lives of women can be witnessed on ground level. It cannot be ignored that the constitutional spirit is usually vulnerable to dynamic socio-cultural paradoxes owing their origin to political constructions and narratives. These paradoxes turn the situation into more aggravated form due to interface of law, administration, religion and politics in Post Truth World. Overflow of information in cosmetic democratic make over by the totalitarian or populist regimes with subtle ideologies block thought process in making the rational choices. In view of the above, the present paper highlights the role of judiciary being the final interpreter of the provisions of the Constitution to ensure constructive transformation. It elaborates the meaning, nature and scope of freedom to profess, practice and propagate the faith or religion and its inter-relationship with liberty to manage religious affairs in reference to gender inclusivity. The discussion revolves around the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Sabarimala Matter, 2019 wherein the court attempted to find out the solution of the paradox prevailing in India from ages. Bodenheimer’s backward full forward push theory has been applied as a constitutional tool to filter out constitutional spirit from multi-polar assertion of truths- truth of social-cultural taboos viz a viz the truths of constitutionalism.