Indian Journal of Law and Justice

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/2866

Indian Journal of Law and Justice (ISSN : 0976-3570 ) is a peer-reviewed Journal published in March and September, by the Department of Law, University of North Bengal, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India. The Indian Journal of Law and Justice are intended to provide a forum for analysis and research on various aspects of law. The IJLJ also invites Research papers, Articles and Technical notes/comments on law and law related issues. For further details see Focus and scope.

Browse

Filters

20241

Advanced Search

Filter by

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Ariyoosu, Dauda A.Subject: search.filters.subject.Human Rights

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Towards Effective Recognition and Enforcement of Awards by the Nigerian National Human Rights Commission in Human Rights Cases
    (University of North Bengal, 2024) Ariyoosu, Dauda A.; Owoade, Abdullateef A.
    Protection of human rights is a universal phenomenon. Many national and international laws, conventions, and other instruments on human rights are handy in the protection of such rights. Unfortunately, much as the protection of human rights is internationally recognised, the practice and procedure for the enforcement of such rights have been a serious cause of concern in human rights cases. The aim of this paper, therefore, was to examine issues in litigating human rights cases vis-à-vis recognition and enforcement of awards made by the National Human Rights Commission in human rights cases. The specific objectives of the paper were to examine the jurisdiction of courts in the enforcement of violation of human rights; recognise the various inalienable fundamental human rights in Nigeria; and identify the powers and functions of the National Human Rights Commission of Nigeria with regard to human rights cases. The paper adopted a doctrinal method with an examination of relevant statutory provisions and case law. It has been found that there are conflicting decisions of superior courts of record regarding the jurisdiction of courts in human rights cases, and this has an adverse effect on the principle of judicial precedent. It was also found that the amendment to the National Human Rights Commission Act has engendered recognition and enforcement of human rights cases by the National Human Rights Commission. The paper recommended that in making awards by the Commission, the requirements of a valid award must be strictly adhered to so as to prevent or minimise a challenge to the validity of the award. It was also recommended that the general public should be sensitised and enlightened through periodic seminars, workshops, conferences, and media of the opportunity provided by the National Human Rights Commission Act to ventilate their grievances.