Philosophical Counseling for Nurturing “Philosophical Quotient (PhilQ)”
DOI
Access Status
This content is available to Open Access.
To download content simply use the links provided under the Files section.
More information about licence and terms of use for this content is available in the Rights section.
Type
Article
Date
2025
Journal Title
Journal Editor
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of North Bengal
Statistics
Total views and downloads
Views
8Downloads
13Authors
Advisor
Editor
Abstract
We come across a burning controversy among scholars regarding the principal teaching of
the Bhagavadgītā. Some scholars think that the principal teaching of the Bhagavadgītā is
jñānayoga. All other yogas are just the helping conditions to jñānayoga. Some thinkers
argue that karmayoga occupies the central position in the teaching of the Bhagavadgītā and
the other yogas are nothing but the auxiliary factors to the same. Philosophers belonging
to the third group are of the opinion that the supreme position has been given to the
bhaktiyoga in the teaching of the Bhagavadgītā. But scholars of the fourth group agree with
none of the three views mentioned. They hold that the principal teaching of the
Bhagavadgītā is to establish that the blended path of all the yogas is the best path. I agree
with the fourth view. The principal objective of my article is to refute the first three views
and ultimately to substantiate the fourth one already mentioned. None of the yogas is subordinate
to others. All of the yogas are equally complementary to each other.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Accession No
Call No
Book Title
Edition
Volume
ISBN No
Volume Number
XXl
Issue Number
ISSN No
0976-4496
eISSN No
Pages
Pages
43 - 57